Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:37:18 +0800
From:      "Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS w/failing drives - any equivalent of Solaris FMA?
Message-ID:  <20080915023717.GF39765@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au>
In-Reply-To: <20080912163207.GE60094@icarus.home.lan>
References:  <C984A6E7B1C6657CD8C4F79E@Slim64.dmpriest.net.uk>  <200809121544.m8CFiRHQ099725@lurza.secnetix.de>  <5f67a8c40809120904o49b6e410l5b65a20f5216202@mail.gmail.com>  <20080912163207.GE60094@icarus.home.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
    0n Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:32:07AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: 

    >> About the only real improvement I'd like to see in this setup is the ability
    >> to spin down idle drives.  That would be an ideal setup for the home RAID
    >> array.
    >
    >There is a FreeBSD port which handles this, although such a feature
    >should ideally be part of the ata(4) system (as should TCQ/NCQ and a
    >slew of other things -- some of those are being worked on).

And the port is ?

 -aW

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914.  If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080915023717.GF39765>