Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:28:43 -0800
From:      "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com>
To:        "Scott Long" <scottl@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Brad Knowles" <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Cc:        <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: 5-STABLE Roadmap
Message-ID:  <25c301c2d3e1$8f2e3e30$52557f42@errno.com>
References:  <200302140036.h1E0aK3q071051@freefall.freebsd.org> <a05200f0dba72122437d7@[10.0.1.2]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> At 4:36 PM -0800 2003/02/13, Scott Long wrote:
>
> >      - the classic 'worldstone'
> >      - webstone - /usr/ports/www/webstone
> >      - Fstress - http://www.cs.duke.edu/ari/fstress
> >      - ApacheBench - /usr/ports/www/p5-ApacheBench
> >      - netperf - /usr/ports/benchmarks/netperf
>
> Are there any other benchmarks that are being considered?  What
> about LMBench?  RawIO?  Bonnie++?  Other disk benchmarks?  Do we care
> about application-layer benchmarks for other protocols, such as SMTP,
> POP3, or IMAP?
>
> Just curious.  Thanks!

This can quickly turn into a bikeshed, but suggest ones.  We're looking for
good benchmarks.  lmbench, rawio, and bonniee are rather "micro" in nature
(not bad, just limited in their usefulness).

    Sam


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25c301c2d3e1$8f2e3e30$52557f42>