Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:20:06 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS timing (Was: Just how stable is current) Message-ID: <199604160450.OAA22276@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199604151859.UAA12685@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Apr 15, 96 08:59:52 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
J Wunsch stands accused of saying: > This seems to be identical with the observation that all recent SNAPs > have increased timing problems (up to totally unusable) when > installing over NFS. > > For me, it required me to revert to 1 KB blocksize (even though the > NFS server is also only a lame 8-bit 3c503), and we've got at least > one installation problem report where the installation totally starved > at the first lengthy file, even _with_ the ``NFS slow'' option. Hmm. I thought it was just me, but maybe not. I have a machine at home at the most recent -SNAP level that NFS-mounts /usr/src. A 'make world' will eventually 'sieze up' - it's still possible to log in, providing you don't do anything NFS related. (Even on another mount). If you do, your process again just stops. The server is -stable from around the beginning of April. > I really wonder what might have caused this change. Indeed. > cheers, J"org -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604160450.OAA22276>