Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:02:37 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Racaille <0xef967c36@gmail.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0707290847440.25963@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <2403547191a53badf6d97fba439ce184.e5f9055e@am>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0707281007310.21300@sea.ntplx.net> <86vec4dxcy.fsf@ds4.des.no> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0707282347310.24233@sea.ntplx.net> <866443h8fk.fsf@ds4.des.no> <2403547191a53badf6d97fba439ce184.e5f9055e@am>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

---559023410-959030623-1185714157=:25963
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=unknown-8bit; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Racaille wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:21:19AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote:
>> Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
>>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote:
>>>> This is the *correct* behaviour.  The termcap entry is supposed to
>>>> reflect the capabilities of the terminal, not your personal preference=
s.
>>>> If you don't like it, you can override it using the TERMCAP environmen=
t
>>>> variable.
>>> Well, something did change recently to get this behavior.
>>
>> New libncurses perhaps?  The termcap file itself hasn't changed since
>> late 2005.
>>
>>>  And why do we have a termcap xterm entry that doesn't exhibit this
>>> behavior?
>>
>> Because somebody modified it to reflect his personal preference:
>>
>> xterm|xterm-color|X11 terminal emulator:\
>>         :ti@:te@:tc=3Dxterm-xfree86:
>
> that's dumb. just like those idiots on linux distributions
> who patched the X server to replace the weave pattern they didn't
> like with another one in their favorite color.

No, it's not dumb.  I seem to recall arguments a long time ago about
this.  I believe the majority don't want the ti/te behavior, and it
is disabled by default for that reason.  No version of Solaris that
I have ever used has behaved that way.  The only others have I seen
with that behavior were Linux and HP/UX.

--=20
DE
---559023410-959030623-1185714157=:25963--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0707290847440.25963>