Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 02:19:37 +0900 From: itojun@iijlab.net To: Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org> Cc: snap-users@kame.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au, altq@csl.sony.co.jp Subject: Re: [altq 806] The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing together ... Message-ID: <2082.988737577@itojun.org> In-Reply-To: gunther's message of Tue, 01 May 2001 17:12:25 GMT. <3AEEEE79.8F7CC7B0@aurora.regenstrief.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>If we keep the filter matching rules separate in IPFILTER, >IPSEC and ALTQ for much longer, this is only duplicating >the maintenance work and will prevent these three great >packages to work together happily. please be aware that, all *BSD projects are using different packet filter/NAT code, so unifying packet classifier is a big big job. try looking at amount of #ifdefs in ipfilter, altq and kame ipsec code. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2082.988737577>