Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Jun 1996 21:49:52 -0400
From:      "Jacob M. Parnas" <jparnas@jparnas.cybercom.net>
To:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Cc:        michaelv@headcandy.com, gpalmer@freebsd.org, dave@persprog.com, questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Which dual Pentium motherboard? Cyrix SMP? 
Message-ID:  <199606150149.VAA20916@jparnas.cybercom.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:54:02 PDT. <199606112354.QAA21173@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

In message <199606112354.QAA21173@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>you write:
>> 
>> In message <199606072303.QAA12291@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>you write:
>> >> 
>> >> In message <199606071942.MAA11811@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>you write:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >David Alderman wrote in message ID
>> >> >> ><26C84A7DC0@novell.persprog.com>:
>> >> 
>> >> I found the best motherboard for dual pentium pros is a new one from
>> >> SuperMicro.  It can be had for just $875 from Micro Assist.  It has
>> >> 8 SIMM 72 pin modules and 4 PCI and 4 ISA cards.  Its model number is MBP6DNF 
>> >> Dual Pentum-Pro Natoma Motherboard from Micro-Assist 888-97-MICRO 
>> >> (processor Mag) (Full-AT Size).  They also sell 32 meg SIMMS for 279 each.
>> >> I'm planning on getting 4 32 meg boards for 128 meg of ram.
>> >
>> >Have you gotten one of these in your hands and actually started to use it?
>> >The reason I have asked is prior history with SuperMicro products for me
>> >has been someplace between mildly disatisfied with problems, to utterly
>> >pissed off about quality.
>> >
>> 
>> No, I haven't.  I still haven't decided which system to get.  What types of
>> problems did you encounter?
>
>Memory system related failures that where probabaly caused by poor
>testing of the PBurst cache chips at the factory.  Replacing the
>cache modules often fixed the boards.
>
>> Were they fixable or did you have to live with the problem.
>
>Having to return > 5% of incoming boards that failed testing is
>not a viable option for an OEM.  I simply discontiuned the product
>line.  You could say the problem was ``fixable'', but having to deal
>with RMA's on a continuale basis was just not reasonable for me to do.
>
>
>-- 
>Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
>Accurate Automation Company                 Reliable computers for FreeBSD
>

Thanks for letting me know.  I'll look for alternatives.  It looks like ASUS
came up with one recently.

Jacob



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606150149.VAA20916>