Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:20:21 +0700 From: Bachilo Dmitry <root@solink.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun X4200 FreeBSD 6.1 experience?? Message-ID: <200609190920.21910.root@solink.ru> In-Reply-To: <E7B50B82-2C5E-43CD-A475-A97069AD2020@redstarling.com> References: <E7B50B82-2C5E-43CD-A475-A97069AD2020@redstarling.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=F7 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C9 =CF=D4 =F0=CF=CE=C5=C4=C5=CC=D8=CE=C9=CB 18= =D3=C5=CE=D4=D1=C2=D2=D1 2006 21:20 ke han =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC(a): > Has anyone experienced FreeBSD 6.1 on a Sun X4200 ? Does everything > work? ILOM? RAID-1 ? 2 sets of RAID-1 ?...any feedback would help me > make a decision. > thanks, ke han Yes, I have. FreeBSD 6.1 (both i386 and amd64 versions) runs perfect on Sun= =20 X4000-series servers. As well as on X2100 and on v20z and v40z. ILOM works= =20 independently with OS, so there is no difference. RAID-1 is hardware, ot=20 software so it does not depend on OS too and works ok. =46reeBSD 6.1 recognizes it's SMP, it's networks interfaces and all it's me= mory=20 amount. Furthermore, while Solaris somehow can't see the whole SAS harddriv= e,=20 =46reeBSD recognizes and partitionizes it all.=20 Sun's AMD servers are actually perfect for x86 FreeBSD systems, I'm telling= =20 ya :-) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 =2D----------------------- =F3 =D5=D7=C1=D6=C5=CE=C9=C5=CD, =E2=C1=DE=C9=CC=CF =E4=CD=C9=D4=D2=C9=CA =F2=D5=CB=CF=D7=CF=C4=C9=D4=C5=CC=D8 =CF=D4=C4=C5=CC=C1 =D3=C9=D3=D4=C5=CD= =CE=CF=CA =C9=CE=D4=C5=C7=D2=C1=C3=C9=C9 =EF=EF=EF "=EB=CF=CD=D0=C1=CE=C9=D1 =F3=CF=EC=C9=CE=CB"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200609190920.21910.root>