Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:29:11 +0200 From: "Michal F. Hanula" <frankie@kyblik.pieskovisko.sk> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: key barriers Message-ID: <20030625102911.GF66485@kyblik.pieskovisko.sk> In-Reply-To: <20030616051310.41F5C6D729@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com> References: <20030616034216.AF44B341B4@www.fastmail.fm> <20030616051310.41F5C6D729@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--p8PhoBjPxaQXD0vg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:13:10PM -0800, Thanjee Neefam wrote: > I like being able to browse to www.debian.org/security and to know that= =20 > on certain days as many as 5 patches are released. And that with a=20 > single command I can apply all the patches I need. >=20 > Now, FreeBSD has a similar page freebsd.org/security but it doesn't list= =20 > as many bugs. Does that mean FreeBSD has fewer holes? Or does it mean= =20 > it takes longer to fix them in FreeBSD? Or that people are not testing= =20 > the security of BSD as much as Debian? I don't know. Short aswer: FreeBSD has fewer holes. Long answer: FreeBSD has fewer holes in the base OS than Debian has in all the packages. Which is quite obvious and doesn't mean anything at all. m&f --=20 What do you care what other people think? --p8PhoBjPxaQXD0vg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE++Xl24PY2BaN84VwRArPUAJ9rWGVaLN3kE/DSu2qLfLyQ4kBv0ACgg5S/ ZrCUkP5SScz4P7Grcj6BG4Y= =fsi2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p8PhoBjPxaQXD0vg--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030625102911.GF66485>