Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:50:09 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <20031125205009.GA38563@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200311252039.hAPKdBfq080963@apollo.backplane.com> References: <20031125025621.453732A8FC@canning.wemm.org> <200311250311.hAP3BTCO075916@apollo.backplane.com> <20031125150700.GA48007@madman.celabo.org> <20031125201421.GB54467@madman.celabo.org> <200311252039.hAPKdBfq080963@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:39:11PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > So, yes, I do think you guys are being lazy in that regard. If this > is the path you've chosen to go then you have an obligation not to > tear out major existing system capabilities, such as the ability to > generate static binaries, in the process. If this is what you think has happened, you're living in some parallel fantasy universe. > There is a lot of circular reasoning going on here... it's the same sort > of circular reasoning that John uses to justify some of the more esoteric > scheduling mechanisms in -current. A because of B because of A, and > to hell with anyone who wanted to use C. Keep the ad homenim attacks to yourself, buster! This was uncalled-for. Kris --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/w8CAWry0BWjoQKURAqU0AJ9i7BHrKyYJYPawsFEZTym49UIybgCeIRWw CrPU0GAEgCgOqbr0z2jS8Qo= =sllq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031125205009.GA38563>