Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 21:44:18 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FYI: A thought on 64-bit time_t on Alpha Message-ID: <20011109214418.A577@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20011109221248.A13839@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20011030225720.A39348@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20011102073924.O94635@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> <20011109104913.B51278@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011109112356.D15768@kayak.xcllnt.net> <20011109221248.A13839@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 10:12:48PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > Depends on what one calls a '-current user'. I build -current on > one of my alphas every now and then. But that is hardly 'using' it. Same here. > My production box is an Athlon. Are we looking for people who > (almost) exclusively use FreeBSD/alpha? And to add to that, -current? I think anyone who has an Alpha is affected, but I'd like to hear from people who have Alpha in production. -current will become -stable and that's where the pain is felt eventually. I don't think that the -current users are necessarily the right people to make the decision. It probably applies double for me... So far I've only heard that's not worth the trouble, but I'm not convinced that avoiding any changes on the Alpha is less trouble. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011109214418.A577>