Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Jul 2014 09:58:53 -0700
From:      hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com>
To:        Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Jan Mikkelsen <janm@transactionware.com>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: r256920 missing in stable/9 and releng/9.3
Message-ID:  <CALCpEUG0DSs3mMaUPTvfKV6S6voEOOHkYifZe406mpM7a8MZYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53BA8666.9040608@omnilan.de>
References:  <37229F0A-4BEA-4712-9AE1-5446A630AF9F@transactionware.com> <53BA8666.9040608@omnilan.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+ freebsd-net@,

On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
<h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote:
> Bez=C3=BCglich Jan Mikkelsen's Nachricht vom 24.06.2014 04:49 (localtime)=
:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m bringing 9.3-RC1 into our local Perforce depot and moving ou=
r local patches to 9.2 forward.
>>
>> I noticed that r256920 (changing sys/netinet/tcp_input.c) has not been M=
FC=E2=80=99d. It was listed as =E2=80=9CMFC after 3 days=E2=80=9D back in O=
ctober 2013.
>>
>> Is this patch missing for a reason?
>
> I'm wondering too if there's any good reason not to MFC?

I also don't see any obvious reason.

If nobody objects on -net@, I can do it.

cheers,
Hiren



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALCpEUG0DSs3mMaUPTvfKV6S6voEOOHkYifZe406mpM7a8MZYA>