Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:27:31 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libutil in Debian Message-ID: <CAGE5yCoPaydYBOL1-yr%2B2KAckUL8oBZ5S7-y1OS0FhT1RM%2BdGw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51DC3A71.5040204@mu.org> References: <CAOfDtXN2fWQAyGNb_ifH9y=zHO%2BGGnSdWnD8C6BzWDTU_7rWFQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130709113553.GP67810@FreeBSD.org> <CAOfDtXOTqzF9=s%2BUv6%2BMoAu0nrmyGrxJz4xaSJYEfDzRvrKx8g@mail.gmail.com> <51DC3A71.5040204@mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> wrote: > Maybe there's a way to make this work since our system is tightly > integrated. > > Have you looked at what happens with autoconf/automake? How bad does it > look from that PoV? Are there a ton of scripts that pull in libutil? Or is > that only a small portion of the base? There are a boatload of autoconf scripts that know libutil is where you get all the BSD bits. There's an extensive history here. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV UTF-8: So you can \342\200\231 .. for when a ' just won't do <brueffer> ZFS must be the bacon of file systems. "everything's better with ZFS"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGE5yCoPaydYBOL1-yr%2B2KAckUL8oBZ5S7-y1OS0FhT1RM%2BdGw>