Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Jan 2014 07:10:04 -0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean=2DS=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= <dumbbell@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org" <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Latest xorg binary packages - plainly doesn't work on Intel GM45
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmokKb8k5ZUYCramDmq-PmNvVpNGCvBofCfQMOmO71aSVqA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52C7E812.2040306@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <CAJ-Vmom=YDzURkhBDmHNYapLTBuybR5zsD6G=ETUix1hpRH5uQ@mail.gmail.com> <52C7E812.2040306@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Looks like its this. I'll use pkg0.isc for 11 - it's finding newer
packages there. pkg0.nyi isn't showing newer packages for me.

The T400 shows xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_5, but the X230 has
xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_1. So yeah, looks like it's that.

Grr!


-a


On 4 January 2014 02:53, Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron <dumbbell@freebsd.org> w=
rote:
> On 04.01.2014 08:15, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hello!
>
>> I just upgraded to the latest -HEAD package build for my Lenovo T400
>> (HEAD, i386) and I discovered that xorg plainly just doesn't work.
>
> Those packages are built without WITH_NEW_XORG:
>
>     X.Org X Server 1.7.7
>     ...
>     (II) Module intel: vendor=3D"X.Org Foundation"
>         compiled for 1.7.7, module version =3D 2.7.1
>
> xorg-server-1.7.7
> xf86-video-intel-2.7.1
>
> I believe this version of the Intel DDX uses the old drm driver, not the
> new drm2 one.
>
> The WITH_NEW_XORG-by-default-for-HEAD switch was made in the ports tree
> on 2013-12-16 (r336621).
>
> I see that each mirror has a different copy of the 11/i386 packages set:
>
> http://pkg0.isc.freebsd.org/freebsd:11:x86:32/latest/digests.txz
> http://pkg0.bme.freebsd.org/freebsd:11:x86:32/latest/digests.txz
>     size: 1070044
>     date: 14-Dec-2013 05:50
>
> http://pkg0.nyi.freebsd.org/freebsd:11:x86:32/latest/digests.txz
>     size: 848720
>     date: 03-Jan-2014 11:56
>
> Differences exist for amd64 packages and 10.x packages too. Is this
> expected? I guess not.
>
> Can you try to use pkg0.nyi.freebsd.org explicitely, see if that works
> for you, and confirm that this is the issue?
>
> --
> Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokKb8k5ZUYCramDmq-PmNvVpNGCvBofCfQMOmO71aSVqA>