Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:05:43 -0500
From:      Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alfred Bartsch <bartsch@dssgmbh.de>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: trouble with poudriere and recent ports tree
Message-ID:  <52540327.4050005@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <525401E3.9060304@dssgmbh.de>
References:  <5253E3AE.5010504@dssgmbh.de> <5253EB2D.2070109@FreeBSD.org> <5253F72C.1060001@dssgmbh.de> <5253FF3A.5010006@FreeBSD.org> <525401E3.9060304@dssgmbh.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--Gj8ipXh46UR9F1S9J9GUCRKNnrCuauAq9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 10/8/2013 8:00 AM, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
> Am 08.10.2013 14:48, schrieb Bryan Drewery:
>> On 10/8/2013 7:14 AM, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
>>> Am 08.10.2013 13:23, schrieb Bryan Drewery:
>>>> On 10/8/2013 5:51 AM, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
>>>>> Hi all, after updating my ports tree to a more recent
>>>>> version (svn revision: 329714), I'm no longer able to build
>>>>> most of my ports with poudriere, as I was before (some weeks
>>>>> ago).
>>>>>
>>>>> IMHO there are two major issuses: 1) the STAGE environment
>>>>> isn't yet fully implemented, as some ports seem to need
>>>>> "NO_STAGE=3Dyes" in make.conf: e.g. devel/libSM,
>>>>> ports-mgmt/poudriere and others. poudriere reports a
>>>>> successful build for these, but the packages do not exist
>>>>> after bulk run.
>>>
>>>> This is not a problem. They are marked NO_STAGE to run=20
>>>> compatibility code until they are converted.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your fast answer.
>>>
>>> AFAICS there are some ports left which are NOT marked NO_STAGE,
>>> but can only be built (at least) with poudriere if NO_STAGE is
>>> set.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So after updating /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf with
>>>>> the NO_STAGE line, I successfully built some ports (e.g.=20
>>>>> poudriere-3.0.9).
>>>
>>>> NO_STAGE is not a user variable. Do NOT put it in your
>>>> make.conf. This will break a lot.
>>>
>>>
>>> Then I need some advice, how to actually build
>>> ports-mgmt/poudriere or
>=20
>> ports-mgmt/poudriere builds fine for me. Can you show the entire
>> build log and your make.conf?
>=20
>=20
> Here you are:
[snip]
> POUDRIERE_VERSION=3D3.0.5
>=20

You should probably just update poudriere from your host ports tree
directly. At least 3.0.6 is required for staging support.

--=20
Regards,
Bryan Drewery


--Gj8ipXh46UR9F1S9J9GUCRKNnrCuauAq9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=H2E6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Gj8ipXh46UR9F1S9J9GUCRKNnrCuauAq9--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52540327.4050005>