Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:45:30 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: state of ide raid Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.0.20030616144212.062a4878@209.112.4.2> In-Reply-To: <20030616143157.R87423@shell.inch.com> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030616134135.046a0e60@209.112.4.2> <87d6hhn707.fsf@Pectopah.shenton.org> <20030613041037.C89958@shell.inch.com> <87d6hhn707.fsf@Pectopah.shenton.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20030616134135.046a0e60@209.112.4.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:34 PM 16/06/2003 -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>I'll second that. I have the 3ware two port model and it seems to have
>"burped" and decided one of the disks was dead. I went to the management
>interface (web-only) and removed/added the "bad" drive and then rebuilt
>the mirror. Performance was fine during the rebuild.
>
>Now why the one drive went "bad" is a question I cannot answer...
>Supposedly the newest firmware supports SMART, but I don't think the
>FreeBSD driver nor the 3ware web interface do anything with that data.
It does for me. Here is an example warning I get on bad drives. It also
logs it to kern via syslog.
SMART Threshold Exceeded condition detected on port 1 on controller ID:0.
Check drive for media errors. (0xf)
This was from a bad Fujitsu.
---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.2.0.9.0.20030616144212.062a4878>