Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 16:57:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> To: Drew Tomlinson <drewt@writeme.com> Cc: "'Paul Herman'" <pherman@frenchfries.net>, Bill Moran <wmoran@iowna.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: FreeBSD - Windows '98 performance Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0105291657180.26414-100000@rac4.wam.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <BA5D0CE1CBB2D411B6AA00A0CC3F02390AFA1D@ldcmsx01.lc.ca.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Change it to 0... it's 1 by default, changing it to 0 will help your bandwidth. Ken On Tue, 29 May 2001, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Herman [mailto:pherman@frenchfries.net] > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 7:05 AM > > To: Bill Moran > > Cc: Drew Tomlinson; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD - Windows '98 performance > > > > > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > Drew Tomlinson wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm pretty green here and have no idea what this is. > > Could you point me to > > > > a URL, man page, etc. that will expand on this? > > > > Delayed ACK is good for links that have large RTTs, and you plan on > > receiving more data than serving. Delayed ACKs got a little > > improvement before 4.3-RELEASE, but I still think for LANs it isn't > > necessary and it'd be OK to turn it off. > > Thank you both for the info. I checked the net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack and it > already is set to "1". Are you saying I can set this to "0"? > > Thanks, > > Drew > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.21.0105291657180.26414-100000>