Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 00:02:03 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE delayed Message-ID: <20020602050203.GA28962@leviathan.inethouston.net> In-Reply-To: <20020601113321.GC15739@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <200205311652.g4VGq5YV004136@intruder.bmah.org> <m3d6vc3vqg.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <200205312119.g4VLJm7d008902@intruder.bmah.org> <20020601113321.GC15739@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > deliberate malice). I get your point though, you have working tagged > > queueing on 4.5 but not on 4.6. > > I wasn't aware of a "negative" or "malicious" connotation of "black > list", I just saw it as a list that said "do not dare tagged queueing on > these chips". I thought there was an actual black list for those chipset makers who couldn't properly do TAGS or certain boards that cannot handle tags( I believe some of the old promise controllers couldn't do it properly) -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net> dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020602050203.GA28962>