Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:52:16 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@ixsystems.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, nonesuch@longcount.org Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 Message-ID: <5211EAD0.1060404@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <520DE306.4080004@freebsd.org> References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51D9B24B.8070303@ixsystems.com> <51DACE93.9050608@freebsd.org> <520DC77C.1070003@ixsystems.com> <520DE306.4080004@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm wondering can I commit this to >> 9-stable now? (or is it already in?) > > It didn't make it because there was only sparse feedback after the > call for testers. There were a couple of replies that it is being > tested but no statements either way if it was good or not. Hence > I erred on the side of caution and refrained from committing it. Revisiting the history of this after vacation absence actually shows that we straddled the release code freeze deadline and you had provided good testing feedback. However the MFC got rejected by RE on the fear of introducing unknown regressions into the release process. >> Would you do the honors? > > Yes, will do later today. Committed to stable/9 as r254515. Let me know if there are any issues. -- Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5211EAD0.1060404>