Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:08:32 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: STI, HLT in acpi_cpu_idle_c1 Message-ID: <200406221708.32433.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200406172333.i5HNXDpd010136@apollo.backplane.com> References: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337051D9018@mail.sandvine.com> <200406172333.i5HNXDpd010136@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 17 June 2004 07:33 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote: > It kinda sounds like ACPI has bokered the other cpus. I'm not sure > why one would even *want* to use ACPI to idle down Xeon's in an MP > system, actually :-) Power and heat savings. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406221708.32433.jhb>