Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Jul 2014 18:47:02 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Should 9.3 carry a warning about NEW_XORG
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmomYMXtmz79ictxpjkGKnCY-9z7hDuhfyUk5h45a%2B_J2Vg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140707204912.GA11191@anubis.morrow.me.uk>
References:  <53B69B88.4060803@gmail.com> <E1X32XF-000PnU-QG@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> <CAPyFy2BhARs%2BwxhOuP-09tcPgzerU00_ARy=o4OyKec9azTOkQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140705103235.GB7680@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407050455010.5138@wonkity.com> <20140706220006.K50382@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407071357340.87353@wonkity.com> <20140707204912.GA11191@anubis.morrow.me.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Plenty of stuff doesn't have a non-accelerated fallback these days.
It's .. stupid.



-a


On 7 July 2014 13:49, Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> wrote:
> Quoth Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>:
>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2014, Ian Smith wrote:
>>
>> > Seeing that a perhaps not miniscule proportion of 9.x X users will need
>> > to do some manual configuration on upgrading to 9.3, a relevant WARNING
>> > in http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.3R/relnotes.html should be helpful.
>>
>> I can agree with the idea of a note, just have no clear idea what it
>> should say.  If people are shown how to stick with the old xorg, they
>> will be marooned and ports that require the newer version will not work.
>> People that upgrade may find their hardware no longer supported.  That's
>> sort of the price of progress with technology.
>
> (No, it's the price of depending on a CADT upstream. It's a shame
> FreeBSD doesn't have the manpower to maintain a fork, since that would
> really be the only reliable option at this point.)
>
> The note should say exactly what you just said: there are no good
> options. Many configurations will either break now or break soon, unless
> you're willing to fall back to VESA-only (is that likely to remain a
> viable option in all cases?). While this is a deplorable situation,
> there is nothing the FreeBSD project can do about it.
>
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomYMXtmz79ictxpjkGKnCY-9z7hDuhfyUk5h45a%2B_J2Vg>