Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Oct 1997 16:43:40 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Christopher R. Bowman" <crb@Glue.umd.edu>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, cliff ainsworth III <cliff@cliffsworld.com>, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: project truck.....ideas wanted 
Message-ID:  <Pine.SOL.3.95q.971008163831.4216A-100000@modulation.eng.umd.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199710081839.MAA11594@rocky.mt.sri.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Nate Williams wrote:

> > Um.  So you are saying that the "introduced" jitter, ie. SA (Selective
> > Availability), is actually predictable?  And that this prediction is 
> > available to a commercial consumer?  What's the point of it then?
> 
> It's not predictable (well, it is, but it's a fairly complex algorithm
> that is not published, essentially making it unpredictable).  The point
> is that the jitter introduced is the same across all of the recievers in
> the same general area, so if one of the receivers isn't moving, you can
> take the 'difference' of the changes made to it and apply it to the
> values on the other receivers taken at the same time.
> 
> (In case anyone is concerned, my brother-in-law at the State of Montana
> is also doing this, so it's not like it's a state secret or
> anything. *grin*)
> 
> Another rumor I've heard about is that the introduced jitter may go
> away.  Interestingly enough, during the most recent 'war' (Desert
> Storm), there weren't enough GPS receivers that could read the
> 'encrypted' channel which has no introduced jitter, so they ended up
> turning off SA and using standard commercial receivers.  It kind of
> defeats the purpose.  That, and DGPS has made it virtually useless for
> anything 'sensitive', so there is serious consideration being made to
> kill it.
> 
> But, many of the GPS manufacturers are fighting it, because it makes
> alot of their 'new generation' products useless, which rely on the
> introduced jitter.  *sigh* Capitalism at it's worst.
> 
> 
> 
> Nate
> 

Scientific Americans Feb '96 page 44 has really good article on GPS and
techniques for improving acuracy by Thomas A. Herring of MIT

---------
Christopher R. Bowman
crb@Glue.umd.edu
<A HREF="http://www.glue.umd.edu/~crb">My home page</A> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.95q.971008163831.4216A-100000>