Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:26:34 -0500
From:      Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Google Talk and NAT issue ?
Message-ID:  <44216CAA.3060609@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGGENPHCAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com>
References:  <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGGENPHCAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
fbsd_user wrote:
> Just what do you mean by punching a hole in the
> firewall without the firewalls knowledge?
> 
> The firewall is designed to stop just such a thing.

If the firewall opens a path for the external server inbound as a result of
supporting active-mode FTP or the data channel for IRC, which most firewalls do
by default if they permit FTP through in the first place, that can be used to
send arbitrary data back to the client.

Having the firewall block FTP, HTTP, and IRC/6667 traffic from inside machines,
except for a trusted and monitored proxy server like Squid, will significantly
improve the security of the network...

-- 
-Chuck



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44216CAA.3060609>