Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:34:10 +0200 From: Gabor PALI <pgj@FreeBSD.org> To: Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org> Cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org, doc@freebsd.org, Marc Fonvieille <blackend@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/multimedia chapter.sgml doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors chapter.sgml Message-ID: <AANLkTikX%2Bhn1FKchh%2BZQoOXRhWJ6-f%2BjKqzp48fHQhg1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DF8F4AE-1D49-49DF-9098-01C9C73804C7@elvandar.org> References: <201009082014.o88KER1S029689@repoman.freebsd.org> <AANLkTing-=5c5d%2BxS=dsFWr8Bpt-gPz6krs7B7-CUpj2@mail.gmail.com> <20100909184128.GA1647@gothic.blackend.org> <AANLkTi=GPF2TYf32Escb=JrZtzV0swFaE6qV7KnPnvjv@mail.gmail.com> <4DF8F4AE-1D49-49DF-9098-01C9C73804C7@elvandar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org> wrote: > Yes, it does make sense to keep them in CVS, because it takes a hell lot > more time to get them translated again then to update the various pieces. > I think I know this very well. Note that I the things that you are suggestion are striking me as one of the > translation teams. We (doc-nl) will decide for ourself whether or not we > update documentation and whether or not we will be keeping 'stale' documents > around. > Obviously. I am just curious, because I do not see too much sense to keep outdated translations in the tree. :g
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikX%2Bhn1FKchh%2BZQoOXRhWJ6-f%2BjKqzp48fHQhg1>