Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:59:06 -0400 From: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start. Message-ID: <20030821165906.GB6266@kokeb.ambesa.net> In-Reply-To: <20030821163749.GC11682@spc.org> References: <20030821161114.GA7094@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030821163749.GC11682@spc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:11:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > What do people think? Can we loose these type of warnings? I'm not sure > > what their need is. The beauty of RCng is that I can say I want Amd (for > <snip> > > I agree with you, but perhaps the warnings should be preserved elsewhere? > Or toggleable via an rc.conf switch? I already took care of this a couple of days ago. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | Fingerprint: 00E8 61BC 0D75 7FFB E4D3 6BF1 B239 D010 3215 D418 mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - Unleash the Daemon !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030821165906.GB6266>