Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:16:07 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> Subject: Re: Optimized ether_crc32_be() Message-ID: <4878.1087938967@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:12:13 EDT." <200406221712.13015.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200406221712.13015.jhb@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin writes: >On Friday 18 June 2004 07:37 pm, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> Taken from kern/49957, here's a table-driven implementation of >> ether_crc32_be() to complement the little-endian one. For 6-byte >> MAC addresses it's about five times faster than the double loop. >> >> Comments? > >Doesn't look like anyone responded. Perhaps ask someone on sparc64 to test it >along with some simple multicast test? (Use mtest to join a group, turn on >bmcastecho and then ping the multicast group to see if it responds?) For things like this I would really advocate adding a regression test over in src/tools/regression. Please ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4878.1087938967>