Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:10:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net>
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0707290904030.25963@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070729124116.GA4489@saltmine.radix.net>
References: <f8hmgs$2c1l$1@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw> <20070729124116.GA4489@saltmine.radix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---559023410-33463914-1185714626=:25963 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:26:52PM +0800, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: >> Because somebody modified it to reflect his personal preference: >> >> xterm|xterm-color|X11 terminal emulator:\ >> :ti@:te@:tc=3D3Dxterm-xfree86: >> >> the "ti@:te@:" part disables the save / restore functionality. >> >> See for instance the log messages for src/share/termcap/termcap.src >> revisions 1.129 and 1.130. > > ...noting that was almost 5 years ago, the current issue is what changed > in the past 6 months. The information that I can see at the moment > leans toward the notion that someone's been using the terminfo data > for some time, and is unpleasantly surprised at the result when using > the termcap. I have no idea what you are talking about (terminfo vs termcap). I am not using anything special, everything is just built from ports and stock -current. --=20 DE ---559023410-33463914-1185714626=:25963--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0707290904030.25963>