Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:14:27 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Conflicting declarations for ffs() Message-ID: <20021021131007.T9369-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20021020190342.A11483@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> [ Data: 2002-10-20 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: Conflicting declarations for ffs() ] > > BSD/OS arranges kernel-only MD headers better by not putting them in > > <machine>. This also inhibits them being abused in MI code. > > What do they do, MACHINE_ARCH/MACHINE_ARCH/header.h and pull it in > via <MACHINE_ARCH/header.h>? This is a good way to hide things, and Yes, at least in an old version (4.1). > is probably an area which won't be exposed (which is correct) in any > way in FreeBSD, in the near future, as there's no real need... <machine> should export anything except MD implementations of MI interfaces, so it shouldn't have anything that is purely MD. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021021131007.T9369-100000>