Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:29:32 -0700 From: David Greenman <dg@root.com> To: Bsdguru@aol.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel ISP1100 or similar 1U experience with 4.3 stable Message-ID: <20010713092932.C49840@nexus.root.com> In-Reply-To: <9a.16f79f8c.28807ca5@aol.com>; from Bsdguru@aol.com on Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 12:32:37PM -0400 References: <9a.16f79f8c.28807ca5@aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>In a message dated 07/12/2001 6:44:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dg@root.com >writes: > >> The cooling in the 2U solution is better than the 1U... > >Which is pretty much all I was recommending. Im not sure why everyone is >getting so hot under the collar. You agree with me, yet you are arguing >anyway. > >"If you have the space, 2U is better". Why is that statement so irritating to >you. Its a fact. you agree with it. So what is the problem? The problem is that you said that 1U solutions are inherently unreliable, which is not true. -DG David Greenman Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org President, TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010713092932.C49840>