Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 04:56:36 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith) Cc: grog@lemis.com, mike@smith.net.au, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INB question Message-ID: <199709190456.VAA09610@usr05.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199709190206.LAA03892@word.smith.net.au> from "Mike Smith" at Sep 19, 97 11:36:03 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That's still not good enough. The reality is "0xff under all except > certain specific circumstances". "Tendency" and "likelihood" both > imply indeterminacy which is not present in this case. And I use the same Delay techniques FreeBSD uses to avoid those particular cases (back-to-back reads, read-before-latch). So I have the information I needed. Thanks to all concerned. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709190456.VAA09610>