Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:29:57 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi_cpu_idle panic (Was: Re: kernel panic with todays source) Message-ID: <20031118172757.S65940@root.org> In-Reply-To: <3FBAC2DB.1080004@centtech.com> References: <20031116120622.O57495@root.org> <200311180346.22259@harrymail> <20031118095752.R64353@root.org> <200311182346.13704@harrymail> <3FBAC2DB.1080004@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Eric Anderson wrote: > >And here is what you requested in your first patch: > > > >cale:~> sysctl hw.acpi.cpu > >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 > >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: 0 > >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_history: 0/0 > > Ok - what do I need to do to try this new acpi stuff out? I'm running > -current as of Nov 14th, and I'd like to help debug/test this on my > notebook.. cvsup to -current as of today would be a good first start. The code was committed Nov 15. Then boot with acpi enabled and post the output of sysctl hw.acpi.cpu. You can try different levels by doing sysctl hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=x where x is 0...(number_supported_states - 1) -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031118172757.S65940>