Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:49:01 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> To: "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [csjp@FreeBSD.org: Re: rtfree: 0xffffff00036fb1e0 has 1 refs] Message-ID: <46D48A3D.6080901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20070828165333.GA14159@sub.vaned.net> References: <20070828165333.GA14159@sub.vaned.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christian S.J. Peron wrote: > I am not sure who has their hands in the routing code these days so > I figured I would just forward this message off here. Does the > following look reasonable? > I'm looking, but mostly with long range goggles on. Yes, this looks like the right change. rtalloc1() always returns an rtentry with the mutex for that rtentry held. regards BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46D48A3D.6080901>