Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:34:34 +0800 From: Denny Lin <dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw> To: Patrick Powell <papowell@astart.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox 4 - Beta Message-ID: <20110319233434.GK129@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <4D84E7A4.6060409@astart.com> References: <rhk948-1bv1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4D723F43.4040506@FreeBSD.org> <4lhc48-s332.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4D73BD6A.7000404@swa.org.ru> <8v9d48-0qi1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <AANLkTi=mdLSHo_PRdBsKAdzdLBhUpMSoRhmnc_XtmxiO@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=WmhP_=4p_i2Fu6qgKMZh3h3S-4%2BNgPbgjRd=0@mail.gmail.com> <20110319080231.684d0fd9@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4D84E7A4.6060409@astart.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:28:04AM -0700, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 03/19/11 00:02, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > >On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600 > >"Edwin L. Culp W."<edwinlculp@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as > >>firefox. It can't be too soon. I have not found any drawbacks to it > >>in the couple weeks of testing. > >> > >Unfortunately, it still goes crazy like the older versions and eats 100% > >of the CPU for no apparent reason. > > > >Otherwise it's no worse than 3.x was. > > > Ummm... does it support Java? There were some issues with newer versions > of firefox requiring newer versions of the JDK which have not been > ported/updated. Use java/openjdk6: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html#MOZ-JAVA-PLUGIN http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=21010 -- Denny Lin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110319233434.GK129>