Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:58:57 +0200
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r198868 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386
Message-ID:  <20091104195857.GJ2331@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10911040806r37f00a8dq2aa3ccd1e5c7b241@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <200911040132.nA41WxtQ012750@svn.freebsd.org> <20091104055811.GY1293@hoeg.nl> <3bbf2fe10911040449j5938ca7eqca5829ceced66f48@mail.gmail.com> <20091104144315.GH2331@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <3bbf2fe10911040806r37f00a8dq2aa3ccd1e5c7b241@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--+Hr//EUsa8//ouuB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 05:06:36PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/11/4, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:49:41PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > > 2009/11/4 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>:
> > > > Hi Attilio,
> > > >
> > > > * Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > > >> Opteron rev E family of processor expose a bug where, in very rare
> > > >> ocassions, memory barriers semantic is not honoured by the hardware
> > > >> itself. As a result, some random breakage can happen in uninvestig=
able
> > > >> ways (for further explanation see at the content of the commit its=
elf).
> > > >
> > > > Ooh. Sounds like an interesting bug.
> > > >
> > > > The bug doesn't manifest itself on UP, right? If so, maybe we shoul=
d add
> > > > some very short instructions to the warning on how to disable SMP.
> > >
> > > Due to the semantic of the bug, I think that it can manifest itself on
> > > UP and a memory barrier failing on UP means that PREEMPTION can blow
> > > up. Considering this I wouldn't suggest anything different between the
> > > UP vs SMP case.
> >
> > CPU is always self-consistent, isn't it ?
> >
> > Also, I very much dislike idea of making our kernel a collection of
> > references to the man pages and URLs, esp. when URL point to the
> > resource not controlled by the project.
>=20
> Ok, as long as you are in favor of stripping the URL, I'm fine with it.

I like des' proposal to have kernel config option to enable compile-time
workaround. This is how freebsd handled cyrix CPUs and Pentium f0 0f bug.

--+Hr//EUsa8//ouuB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrx3QAACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hrrQCgrqEgeU0rfaE5IKEsI982uVO3
p3sAnRUUTmmnXfoq/6iaVd7Mb73ntrda
=0ujk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+Hr//EUsa8//ouuB--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091104195857.GJ2331>