Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Apr 2000 22:37:26 +0000
From:      Mike Muir <mmuir@es.co.nz>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x  wednesday
Message-ID:  <39037B26.33C1B62F@es.co.nz>
References:  <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com> <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk> <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com> <39035629.BC369DD4@es.co.nz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Muir wrote:
> 
> Nate Williams wrote:
> 
> > I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable
> > branch (yet).  That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that
> > happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release.
> 
> That would kinda make sense since cvsuping with tag=RELENG_3 seems to
> give me FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (#0: Sat Apr 22 20:59:03 PDT 2000)..

Ok wait im a moron.. been using the stable-supfile instead of the
4.x-stable-supfile.. hmmmmm.

mike.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39037B26.33C1B62F>