Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 20:49:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Melvyn Sopacua <melvyn@magemana.nl> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>, portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ACTION REQUIRED - Unstaged Ports being DEPRECATED on June 31st. Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405122042210.49377@fire.magemana.nl> In-Reply-To: <5370843F.8070104@marino.st> References: <536E46E0.7030906@FreeBSD.org> <53707FF6.3010300@bsdforen.de> <5370843F.8070104@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 May 2014, John Marino wrote: > I commit PR patches that are 6 to 18 months old fairly frequently. > There is obviously a huge backlog but many PRs are processed daily. The > PRs that aren't getting processed quickly are "[NEW PORT]" PRs (and > apparently anything mentioning fuse-fs for some reason). A staging PR > is going to jump the line; it has a higher priority. > > Why would you even entertain the idea that a staging PR will fall > between the cracks? Perhaps the better question is: what are the factors that will make committers shy away from a PR, even if it's summary contains stage? [1] Maybe we (maintainers) can do better? [1] <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports&severity=&priority=&class=maintainer-update&state=open&sort=none&text=&responsible=&multitext=stage&originator=&release=>; -- Melvyn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1405122042210.49377>