Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:03:52 -0400 From: Guillaume <amyfoub@videotron.ca> To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Bryan Liesner <bleez@comcast.net> Subject: Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM) Message-ID: <1063847031.804.4.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> In-Reply-To: <20030917114036.GA72243@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <1062861719.2761.35.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030916132228.GG52463@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <1063763321.776.2.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030917091350.GA59292@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20030917070959.L458@gravy.homeunix.net> <20030917114036.GA72243@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Mer 17/09/2003 à 07:40, Thomas Quinot a écrit : > Le 2003-09-17, Bryan Liesner écrivait : > > > The patch seems to work, my cd0 and cd1 lines in the dmesg now report > > 33.000 MB/s insetad of 3.300 MB/s. > > OK, good, so that's one half of the problem resolved. Now, can you test > whether the actual performances are improved or still slow? > The patch does nothing for me. Same results... and cd0 is still slow. Guillaume
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1063847031.804.4.camel>