Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:09:53 -0800
From:      David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r308256 - in head/misc/figlet: . files
Message-ID:  <20121204180953.GJ3960@dragon.NUXI.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=_MRSQr7Us1J5NeGd=8C8s6U09Xoy9ARw0g6N0yejL9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201212041734.qB4HYC4A045663@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxg=_MRSQr7Us1J5NeGd=8C8s6U09Xoy9ARw0g6N0yejL9Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:44:04PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 4 December 2012 12:34, David E. O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Author: obrien
> > Date: Tue Dec  4 17:34:12 2012
> > New Revision: 308256
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/308256
> >
> > Log:
> >   Run the tests to ensure a good build.
> 
> Other ports use test: or regression-test: for this. Can we use the same?

I want the always tests to run so we know if we have a bad build.
I would think we should always do this as otherwise the tests will likely
seldom get run.

I could change it to:

    -post-build:
    +regression-test:
	    @ cd ${WRKSRC} && ${MAKE} check
     
    +post-build test: regression-test

so that these targets exist for manual running.  I actually like that, so
I'll commit this patch and we can continue talking about the 'post-build'
usage.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121204180953.GJ3960>