Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:08:37 +0200 From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Subject: Re: CFT: vdfuse port (was: Re: Mounting VirtualBox vdi files [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]) Message-ID: <20100915180837.GC34329@triton8.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009141248370.54151@wonkity.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007052053090.9243@wonkity.com> <20100706032057.GA15827@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au> <201009022024.o82KOVni007042@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009081918340.25377@wonkity.com> <20100911184519.GA2100@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009111302590.62686@wonkity.com> <20100913211401.GA49701@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009141248370.54151@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:00:19PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: >[...] > In any case, I'd rather have a port that is not 100% than no port at > all. Announcing possible problems in the pkg-message would be > appropriate. Well if we can establish that readonly works consistently at least for `some' versions of FreeBSD then that might be an option. Thanx, Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100915180837.GC34329>