Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:33:42 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" <andrewl@io.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patches for NFS lockmanager Version 4 Message-ID: <20010918093342.B61456@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109180247090.8225-100000@hagbard.io.com>; from andrewl@io.com on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:55:05AM -0500 References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109180247090.8225-100000@hagbard.io.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Andrew P. Lentvorski <andrewl@io.com> [010918 02:55] wrote: > Folks, > > I have made a set of changes to the -CURRENT rpc.lockd which enables it to > pass the Connectathon 2001 regression suites when being run from a Solaris > client to a FreeBSD server. The patches enable proper lock testing on > file byte ranges. > > I'd like to get someone on the main FreeBSD team to look at it and get it > committed (or at least give me a reason why they rejected it) before > embarking on the more significant task of enabling some of the nastier > cases of file range locking and unlocking. > > Also, I'd love to talk to someone more in the know about implementing NFS > and NFS lock manager protocols. A better set of regression tests than the > Connectathon suite would also be useful if they exist. > > Let me know who I should talk to and what I should do. You can probably talk to either me (alfred), David Cross (crossd) or Ian Dowse (iedowse) about this. I'm interested to see what you have. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010918093342.B61456>