Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:06:11 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFR] Specify the lock(1) timeout unit Message-ID: <20041021170611.GB49881@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20041021143208.GA769@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <20041021113709.GB7732@straylight.m.ringlet.net> <20041021143208.GA769@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:32:08PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2004.10.21 14:37:10 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: >=20 > > Here's a little patch that teaches lock(1) about timeouts specified in > > seconds, hours, or days in addition to the minutes it currently assumes. > > I could commit this in a week if there are no objections. >=20 > Wouldn't it be more natural to just append the time-unit type to the > argument given to -t, e.g. "-t 10s" or "-t 10h". That just seem like > the more intuitive way to handle it to me... >=20 > Note: this is a suggestion, not an objection to the original patch. >=20 Yes, please. :-) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBd+yDqRfpzJluFF4RAkP6AJ9pdXFbgpOTi0G10kzRsoJbx7svsgCdH284 dav+wtfUHub0L3FqXDXP66o= =5Zwn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041021170611.GB49881>