Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 19:17:00 +0200 From: Thomas Seck <tmseck-lists@netcologne.de> To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Scripting languages (was: Re: Package system flaws?) Message-ID: <20020724171700.GC823@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <20020724134228.GA4475@gits.dyndns.org> References: <200207231706.g6NH6XOV076926@dotar.thuvia.org> <200207231745.g6NHjfZ47049@green.bikeshed.org> <20020723191638.GA53463@over-yonder.net> <20020724121335.A42303@regency.nsu.ru> <20020724134228.GA4475@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Cyrille Lefevre (cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net): > On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 12:13:35PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Wait, doesn't Linux (all of them) just have sh -> bash ? > > the reason why many GNU/Linux `sh' scripts aren't portable at all. > unfortunately, I have no good example in my mind right now, sorry. test x$variable == x -- Thomas Seck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020724171700.GC823>