Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 18:39:11 -0500 From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net> To: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: xchat depends Message-ID: <010401bfb16a$f45dc920$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> References: <200004282130.JAA20020@ducky.nz.freebsd.org>; <20000428144552.A2174@luna.cdrom.com> <200004282202.KAA20457@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> <20000428162038.C41443@luna.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Jim Mock" <jim@luna.cdrom.com> > That would make sense, unless the list compilation ignores dependencies > defined in bsd.port.mk (such as libtool). Notice that libtool isn't > defined the same way the other depends are, it's defined with > USE_LIBTOOL instead. > bsd.port.mk doesn't ignore dependencies that it defines. It's just that the list that it compiles for a package is based on the RUN_DEPENDS, and LIB_DEPENDS that a port/package might need in order to run. USE_LIBTOOL defines the libtool dependency as a BUILD_DEPENDS, thus it doesn't get included in a packages list of dependencies. Scot To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?010401bfb16a$f45dc920$8dfee0d1>