Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:59:41 -0700 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: Niclas Zeising <niclas.zeising@gmail.com>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports Message-ID: <432743E3-272A-40F5-AF31-6C1805F620F3@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <4DFF76C7.5070001@missouri.edu> References: <20110620153753.GA41541@freebsd.org> <4DFF73E3.5010405@gmail.com> <4DFF76C7.5070001@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 20, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > What I would like is a primer on how to suppress all the warnings and errors created by K&R code. OK: http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#cl_diagnostics Of course, you can only suppress warnings; you cannot suppress actual errors. clang doesn't currently support -traditional aka pure K&R C. It's possible that compiling with -ansi aka -std=c89 might help-- at least you should get -Wno-implicit-function-declaration and maybe -Wno-implicit-int. > Also, why is this an error: > error: non-void function 'top_button_cross' should return a value [-Wreturn-type] > when most everything else is a warning. (See http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110616185105/xppaut-5.99.log.) top_button_cross() probably should be declared as returning void. What's presumably happening is that it gets a default return type of int since it doesn't otherwise specify a return type, and then fails to have an explicit return, which is an error. Regards, -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?432743E3-272A-40F5-AF31-6C1805F620F3>