Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:24:29 -0600 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r390900 - head/converters/p5-Convert-UUlib Message-ID: <FFEB3F8A-9421-4645-A172-C2E505103331@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <20150629202928.GA66461@hades.panopticon> References: <201506291350.t5TDoUGT039925@svn.freebsd.org> <20150629202928.GA66461@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 29 Jun, 2015, at 14:29, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote: >=20 > * Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh (sunpoet@FreeBSD.org) wrote: >=20 >> Author: sunpoet >> Date: Mon Jun 29 13:50:29 2015 >> New Revision: 390900 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/390900 >>=20 >> Log: >> - Remove DOCS option >> - Bump PORTREVISION for package change >=20 > Why? Removing readme which duplicates perldoc makes sence, but Changes > here is useful bit of documentation. Every perl module contains a Changes file, but only a very, very small = proportion of perl module ports actually install it. For the vast majority of modules in the ports tree, people are expected = to find the Changes file on their own (though we make it pretty easy = between the WWW link and by convention linking to it in the commit log = with every update). Consistency is important, and if we're not going to = install the Changes file, we should just not do it everywhere. Personally I completely agree with sunpoet removing the Changes file = from installation. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FFEB3F8A-9421-4645-A172-C2E505103331>