Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:26:39 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Vitaly Markitantov <vm@dics.com.ua>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: smbfs broken? Message-ID: <20021024142639.GA46022@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <3DB6EB16.2025AAE3@mindspring.com> References: <3DB664D0.FE0B8018@mindspring.com> <XFMail.20021023105107.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20021023152144.GA10351@iron.del.local> <20021023160014.GM661@starjuice.net> <3DB6EB16.2025AAE3@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2002/10/23 11:31), Terry Lambert wrote: > AHA! > > The reason an FFS write resulted in an SMBFS read is that > you had mmap()'ed an SMBFS file, and then wrote a mapped > but-not-in-core page to the target FFS file. Well, a similar problem occurred with cat(1), which doesn't use mmap(). However, I should have included in my message that the following messages are received from the kernel: Oct 23 17:53:02 axl kernel: smbfs_getpages: error 60 Oct 23 17:53:02 axl kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 8022 (cp) Oct 23 17:58:18 axl kernel: smbfs_getpages: error 4 Oct 23 17:58:18 axl kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 8087 (cp) This supports your theory. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021024142639.GA46022>