Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Sep 1997 23:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc:        Andrew Atrens <atrens@nortel.ca>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, gram@cdsec.com, phk@critter.freebsd.dk, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Bug in malloc/free 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.970918233308.1895E-100000@current1.whistle.com>
In-Reply-To: <199709190521.OAA00674@word.smith.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

probably a printf or other stdio function

On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, Mike Smith wrote:

> > 
> > ^Cddd in malloc(): warning: recursive call.
> > Virtual memory exceeded in `new'
> > 
> > After reading Graham's thread I relinked it against libgnumalloc, and low
> > and behold it works like a charm !
> > 
> > Does this point to an incompatibility problem between phkmalloc and g++
> > compiled code ?
> 
> Something in malloc, somehow, is calling malloc() again, by the look of 
> it. 
> 
> Does libg++ define any replacements for any of the standard C library 
> functions?  I've been going through just about *everything* I can find
> in case Poul has missed something; there is nothing in any of the 
> malloc-called code (mostly just abort()) that is likely to be relevant 
> to this.
> 
> mike
> 
> 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970918233308.1895E-100000>