Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:46:59 -0700
From:      Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>
To:        "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/touch touch.1 touch.c
Message-ID:  <20070410094659.49041afb@conflict.ca.sophos.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070410071256.GJ91694@wantadilla.lemis.com>
References:  <200704090219.l392Jc1f064727@repoman.freebsd.org> <864pnpdf8w.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070410010901.GD61460@wantadilla.lemis.com> <86zm5gr9wl.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070410071256.GJ91694@wantadilla.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:42:56 +0930
"Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 10 April 2007 at  9:00:42 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> > Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >> On Monday,  9 April 2007 at 12:16:47 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> >>> The latter part is incorrect and should be reverted.  Furthermore,
> >>> usage() should be static.
> >> Can you give details?
> >
> > usage() should be the way it was before your commit, except that it
> > should be static.
> 
> You mean declared as a static function?  In a program of a single
> file?
> 
> As I said before,
> 
> >> Can you give details?
> 
> Specifically, this doesn't match my recollection of "good practice".
> Where is this behaviour mandated?

Bump WARNS?  Every function should be either prototyped
or declared static (or both).

-- 
Brian Somers                                       <brian@Awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !            <brian@FreeBSD.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070410094659.49041afb>