Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 20:54:23 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) To: rich@rich.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu Cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu, torstenb@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: xpm static library Message-ID: <199610160354.UAA19235@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199610160338.WAA25404@richc.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu> (message from Rich Murphey on Tue, 15 Oct 1996 22:38:56 -0500 (CDT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* |Just let me jump in here a moment. All that stuff is controlled by * |FreeBSD.cf, which we really ought to get some chance to tweak, you know. * |Before it becomes a regular part of a distribution is the right time to * |consider it. * | * |One possibility is to ask that a site.def file be sited in OUR * |/usr/share/mk directory, so we could get our own meathooks on part of the * |config. * * Yep, FreeBSD.cf would be the ideal place to '#define * ForceNormalLib YES' specificly for FreeBSD. Would that * fix it? Rich Yes, that would fix the immediate xpm problem. However, you may want to consider why it was removed from bsdLib.rules in the first place. :) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610160354.UAA19235>