Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:33:37 +0300
From:      Oleg Bulyzhin <oleg@freebsd.org>
To:        Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, supportsobaka@mail.ru, davidch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Broadcom NetXtreme II BMC5708 no carrier
Message-ID:  <20071127093337.GA36544@lath.rinet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20071126050338.GB1025@cdnetworks.co.kr>
References:  <1452057316.20071124171853@mail.ru> <20071126050338.GB1025@cdnetworks.co.kr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:03:38PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:

> 
> It seems that mii_ticks is not kicked at all in auto-negotiation
> phase. From the output of forced 1000baseSX media configuration I
> guess BRGPHY_BMSR_ACOMP bit in BRGPHY_MII_BMSR is not updated on
> 5708S. Mabe davidch know better what's going on 5708S. (CCed)
> How about attached patch? I don't have the hardware so it's just a
> guess work.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Pyun YongHyeon

I just want to confirm that removing mii_ticks increment was bad idea.

-- 
Oleg.

================================================================
=== Oleg Bulyzhin -- OBUL-RIPN -- OBUL-RIPE -- oleg@rinet.ru ===
================================================================




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071127093337.GA36544>