Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:39:28 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a Soekris 4801
Message-ID:  <20050619213927.GA18943@dragon.NUXI.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0506191610170.7472-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
References:  <66959.1119209763@critter.freebsd.dk> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0506191610170.7472-100000@sea.ntplx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 04:22:23PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> How about NO_FOO[_INSTALL], where NO_FOO = no build and no install,
> and NO_FOO_INSTALL just prevents the install.  In theory, you could
> build the complete system, then use NO_FOO_INSTALL instead of rm(1).

Why not 'make buildworld ; make -DNO_FOO installworld'?  Won't that do
the same thing with out littering up the Makefiles with NO_FOO_INSTALL
knobs?   (there are clean ways of adding NO_FOO_INSTALL programaically,
but that will take a little overhaul to do)

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050619213927.GA18943>